[Bluebird]

Looks pretty good for a $1200.00 camera.Not quite the replacement for the D300s but close.24 mp no low pass filter 6 fps but a low buffer could hurt BIF shots.Also a 1.3 crop inside a 1.7 crop option making it a 2x crop at almost 16 mp.Interesting.I am being told though that all camera crops is the same quality as if cropped it in photoshop.Any thoughts?Thanks Ted

[merlinator]

Ted, looks like a good camera but I'm going to wait for the D400 or whatever replaces the D300S I have. I have the D4 so I can wait. The only thing I can see is that it have no AF ON button on the back, which I use on my cameras.
You are right, makes no difference if the crop is in the camera or post processing.

[revs]

there has been some buzz about this camera, looks intriguing.

My D300 and D300s are getting long in the tooth, still hoping for a D400 one of these days though.

[Deon]

There was a a lot of speculation when the D7100 was announced, but Nikon Japan confirmed that a D300S replacement (D400) is still in the works.

[Bluebird]

Yep I think the d400 will now be next year or very late this year.I would expect to be $1500.00 to 2000.00.Thanks Merlinator.Ted

[Keithmac]

Check the Moose Petersen website, he just used it on one of his trips and had a lot of good things to say about the camera.

[BirdsofBC]

Ted, looks like a good camera but I'm going to wait for the D400 or whatever replaces the D300S I have. I have the D4 so I can wait. The only thing I can see is that it have no AF ON button on the back, which I use on my cameras.
You are right, makes no difference if the crop is in the camera or post processing.

is that you , Roy? lol.

[Bluebird]

Thanks Keith.Ted